GrowthStackAdvisory
Book 30 min

GrowthStack Advisory / Resources / South East Asia GTM

Logistics and supply chain

Opening South East Asia for a logistics platform

The short answer

South East Asia is treated as one territory on almost every expansion plan and behaves as several. For logistics software the most expensive mistake is targeting the headquarters rather than the operation: a company registered in Singapore may run its fulfilment out of Jakarta, and the people who feel the operational pain, hold the budget and can pilot the software are frequently in different countries. Singapore concentrates regional decision makers and very little volume. Indonesia has the volume, at a price point and a level of fragmentation that changes what the product has to do. The Philippines adds a geography problem that is structural rather than commercial. One sequence across all three underperforms in all three.

Shobhit Gupta, founder of GrowthStack Advisory

By Shobhit Gupta

Founder, GrowthStack Advisory. Built GTM inside Locus, GoComet and Landmark’s Logistiq division, and delivered for Easyship.

· 7 min read

Why one region is several markets

Regional expansion plans usually create a line item called APAC or South East Asia, assign it to one person, and run the same motion that worked at home. For most software categories that is merely inefficient. For logistics software it fails, because the differences between these markets are operational rather than cultural, and operational differences change the product conversation rather than just the messaging.

Both Locus, a last-mile dispatch platform, and GoComet ran across these markets alongside the US, Europe and the Middle East, so what follows is drawn from operating there rather than from a market entry report.

Headquarters versus operation: the expensive mistake

This is the one worth getting right before anything else. In South East Asia the registered entity and the operation are frequently in different countries, and logistics software is bought by the operation.

A regional business may be incorporated in Singapore for tax, banking and investor reasons, hold its leadership there, and run actual warehousing and delivery out of Indonesia, Vietnam or Malaysia. Build a target list from company registration data and you will produce a list of Singapore addresses, write messaging about Singaporean logistics conditions, and send it to people whose operational problem is in Jakarta.

The practical fix is to qualify on where the goods move, not where the company is registered. That is the same principle as qualifying on throughput rather than company size, described in why volume is the qualifying number, and in this region it also determines which pain your message should name.

It has a second consequence for the buying committee. The operational champion and the budget holder may genuinely sit in different countries and time zones, which turns the multi-threading described in the logistics buying committee into a scheduling problem as well as a political one.

Singapore: decisions, not volume

Singapore is where regional decision makers concentrate and where comparatively little of the physical volume actually is. It is a small domestic market with an outsized share of regional headquarters, and the logistics operations that matter commercially are usually elsewhere.

What that means in practice: Singapore is the right place to find the person who can approve a regional rollout and the wrong place to find the operational pain that justifies it. A pipeline built only from Singapore looks senior and converts slowly, because every deal needs a champion somewhere else.

It is also the most competitive market in the region for software attention. Buyers there are approached constantly and by better-resourced vendors, so a generic sequence performs worse than it would in a market with less noise.

Indonesia: volume, fragmentation and price

Indonesia is where the operational volume is, and it comes with three characteristics that change the product conversation rather than just the pitch.

Fragmentation. Delivery is spread across a long tail of local and regional carriers rather than concentrated in a few national ones. Software that assumes a handful of carrier integrations discovers a much longer list, and multi-carrier capability stops being a feature and becomes the entry requirement.

Geography. An archipelago changes what inter-island movement costs and how long it takes, so assumptions baked into a platform designed for contiguous road networks surface as edge cases that are not edge cases here.

Price expectation. Pricing set against a western or Singaporean benchmark reads as unserious. This is where the volume threshold argument matters most: a high volume Indonesian operation may be an excellent fit on throughput and still fail on price if the commercial model has not been thought about for the market.

The upshot is that Indonesia rewards vendors who have adapted and punishes those who have translated.

The Philippines: a structural geography problem

The Philippines presents the archipelago problem in a sharper form, with the added factor that a substantial part of the commercial services base sits in outsourcing and shared service operations.

For logistics software that produces two distinct kinds of buyer in one country: domestic operations moving goods across islands, where the pain is inter-island transit and last mile in dense urban areas, and service operations run on behalf of businesses elsewhere, which behave more like the third-party logistics buyer described in selling to shippers, carriers and 3PLs.

Treating those as one segment is the local version of the mistake this whole page is about.

Covering the region without pretending to

The default staffing answer is one regional owner covering South East Asia. It looks efficient on an organisation chart and it produces thin coverage everywhere.

Two things matter more than headcount. The first is hours. Coverage means being available in the buyer’s working day, and a team notionally covering the region from outside it will miss the window that matters, which is the argument made in speed to lead. The second is language and local carrier fluency. English will get a meeting with a regional decision maker in Singapore. It is a weaker instrument with an operations manager in a Jakarta warehouse, and knowing the local carriers by name is worth more than any amount of polished messaging.

When Shobhit Gupta scaled sales development at GoComet, the team was distributed across the US, India and South East Asia rather than run remotely from one location, and at Locus the same regional coverage sat alongside the US, Europe and the Middle East. The structural argument for building the management layer before the headcount is in how to scale an SDR team.

Where events still work

Regional logistics conferences remain unusually effective in this market, more so than in categories where the buyer is comfortable evaluating software over a video call. Operations people in this region are reachable in person in a way they are not by cold email, and a regional event concentrates the exact buyers a list would take a quarter to assemble.

Shobhit Gupta represented Locus at the Last Mile ASEAN Conference and Expo, and event prospecting works as a compressed version of the same motion described elsewhere on this site: a named list of attendees, a message naming a specific operational symptom, and follow up that does not stop after the first attempt. The mechanics are the same as the pre-event and post-event work run for NuVista AI around AWS Summits, described in the case studies.

Part of a five guide series on selling logistics and supply chain software. See also why the sales cycle runs long, the three buyers, why volume is the qualifying number, and the buying committee.

The vertical argument and named results are on GTM for logistics and supply chain software. For the equivalent argument in another region, see B2B lead generation for the UAE and Gulf.